The duty: four things that must happen, or it was not consultation
Section 47(1) requires a PCBU to consult, so far as is reasonably
practicable… with workers who carry out work for the business or
undertaking who are, or are likely to be, directly affected by a matter
relating to work health or safety
, and it attaches a tier C monetary
penalty, the same tier as the parallel duty in section 46 to consult,
co-operate and co-ordinate with every other business that shares a duty.
Section 48 then defines what consultation legally is, and each limb is a
test a suggestion box fails. Relevant information must be shared with
workers; workers must get a reasonable opportunity to express their views
and to raise work health or safety issues
and to contribute to the
decision-making process
; their views must be "taken into account"; and
they must be advised of the outcome of the consultation in a timely
manner
. If workers have an HSR, section 48(2) makes involving that
representative part of the definition. Section 49 lists when the duty
switches on: identifying hazards and assessing risks, deciding on control
measures, deciding on welfare facilities, proposing changes that may affect
health or safety, and making decisions about the procedures themselves,
consultation, issue resolution, worker health monitoring, workplace
monitoring, and the provision of information and training. That last item
means a business cannot even decide how to train people without asking
them first. How consultation sits inside the wider management system an
officer must verify is covered on
the safety management systems page;
this page is about the machinery itself.
Health and safety representatives: elected by workers, trained at the employer's cost
The machinery starts with a single sentence: under section 50, any
worker may ask the person conducting the business or undertaking to
facilitate the conduct of an election
for one or more HSRs. The PCBU does
not get to decline; section 51 obliges it to facilitate the determination
of work groups, negotiated with the workers, and section 61 puts the
election procedure in the workers' hands: The workers in a work group may
determine how an election of a health and safety representative for the
work group is to be conducted
, with the PCBU required to provide the
resources and facilities the election reasonably needs. Only members of the
work group can stand and only members vote (sections 60 and 62), if
candidates equal vacancies no ballot is needed (section 63), and the term
of office is three years (section 64). Once elected, the HSR has a
training entitlement with hard edges: section 72 requires the PCBU, on
request, to allow the representative to attend a regulator-approved course
chosen by the health and safety representative
, to release them within
three months of the request on full pay, and to pay the course fees.
Regulation 21 of the
model WHS Regulations
sizes the entitlement: an initial course of training of up to 5 days
plus
up to one day's refresher each year. The training matters beyond the
classroom, because the Act gates the HSR's two strongest powers on having
completed it. It matters to boards too: the officer due-diligence
examples in section 27(5)(e) of the December 2025 consolidation now
expressly include "consulting with workers" and ensuring that health and
safety representatives receive their entitlements to training
among the
obligations an officer must have compliance processes for.
Section 68 lists what an HSR can do: represent the work group, monitor
the PCBU's compliance measures, investigate complaints and inquire into
anything that appears to be a risk
to the work group's health or safety.
In support, the HSR may inspect the workplace after reasonable notice, or
without notice in the event of an incident, or any situation involving a
serious risk
; accompany an inspector on an inspection; sit in on
health-and-safety interviews with a worker's consent; request a health and
safety committee; receive health and safety information about the work
group, though never personal or medical information about an identifiable
worker without consent (section 68(3)); and request assistance from any
person. Section 70 turns those powers into PCBU obligations with a tier D
penalty: consult the HSR, confer when reasonably requested, provide access
to information, provide the resources and assistance the role reasonably
needs, and allow the representative the time the functions take, on full
pay.
The two hard powers: the eight-day notice and the stop
A trained HSR who reasonably believes a person is contravening a
provision of this Act
, or has contravened it in circumstances making
repetition likely, can issue a provisional improvement notice under
section 90, a written notice requiring the contravention to be remedied.
The Act builds in due process on both sides. The HSR must consult the
person first (section 90(3)), cannot issue a PIN where an inspector has
already dealt with the same matter, and the notice must state what
provision is believed contravened, how, and a compliance date at least
8 days after the notice is issued
(section 92). The recipient has 7 days
to ask the regulator to have an inspector review the notice, which stays
it until the inspector confirms, varies or cancels it (sections 100 to
102). But a PIN that is not challenged is not advisory: section 99 makes
non-compliance an offence carrying a tier B monetary penalty, one of the
higher tiers in the Act. In effect the model law hands a trained workplace
representative a junior version of an inspector's improvement notice, with
an appeal path instead of a discretion to ignore it.
The second power needs no paperwork. Section 84 gives every worker the
right to cease unsafe work: a worker may cease, or refuse to carry out,
work if the worker has a reasonable concern that to carry out the work
would expose the worker to a serious risk to the worker's health or
safety, emanating from an immediate or imminent exposure to a hazard
.
Section 85 extends it to the collective: an HSR with the same reasonable
concern may direct workers in the work group to cease work, normally after
consulting the PCBU and attempting issue resolution, but immediately and
without consultation if the risk is so serious and immediate or imminent
that it is not reasonable to consult before giving the direction
. The
direction is training-gated (section 85(6)), the ceased worker must stay
available for suitable alternative work the PCBU may lawfully assign
(sections 86 and 87), and section 88 protects continuity of engagement, so
a lawful stop cannot quietly become a resignation. What that right looks
like against a live hazard, hot work in a heatwave, is worked through on
the heat page.
Health and safety committees: five workers, two months, no veto
Where an HSR represents a work group, a committee is the standing
forum, and its trigger is deliberately low. Under section 75 the PCBU
must establish a health and safety committee… within 2 months after
being requested to do so
by an HSR or by 5 or more workers at that
workplace
, with a tier F penalty attached. The membership rule in section
76 is the clause that keeps a committee from becoming a management
meeting: At least half of the members of the committee must be workers
who are not nominated by the person conducting the business or
undertaking.
An HSR who consents is a member as of right, and if the
parties cannot agree on the make-up, either side can ask the regulator to
appoint an inspector whose decision binds as if agreed. The committee's
functions under section 77 are co-operative rather than adversarial,
facilitating co-operation on health and safety measures and helping
develop the workplace's standards, rules and procedures, and section 78
sets the floor for a live committee: it must meet… at least once
every 3 months
, and at any reasonable time when half its members ask.
Section 79 funds it: members attend on paid time, and the committee gets
access to the PCBU's information about hazards and worker health and
safety, again minus identifying personal or medical information without
consent.
The Part 5 machinery at a glance: what a worker or HSR can set in motion, what the model WHS Act then requires of the PCBU, and the deadline or penalty tier the Act attaches. Sections cited are from the 5 December 2025 consolidation; penalty tiers are set in dollars by each jurisdiction.
| The trigger | What must follow | Deadline / consequence |
|---|---|---|
| Any worker requests an HSR election (s 50) | PCBU facilitates work-group determination and the election (ss 51, 61) | Tier D penalty for failing to provide election resources |
| HSR requests training (s 72) | Paid leave for the HSR's chosen approved course, fees paid by the PCBU; 5 days initial + 1 day/year refresher (reg 21) | Time off within 3 months of the request; tier D penalty |
| HSR or 5+ workers request a committee (s 75) | PCBU establishes a health and safety committee; at least half its members not employer-nominated (s 76) | Within 2 months; tier F penalty |
| Trained HSR issues a provisional improvement notice (s 90) | Recipient remedies the contravention, or asks the regulator for an inspector's review within 7 days (s 100) | Compliance date at least 8 days out; tier B penalty for non-compliance (s 99) |
| Trained HSR directs that unsafe work cease (s 85) | Work stops; PCBU may assign safe, suitable alternative work (s 87) | Continuity of engagement protected (s 88) |
One honesty note for multi-state operators. These are the model provisions, which the model-laws hub records as implemented in every jurisdiction except Victoria. Victoria runs its own worker-participation machinery, HSRs, designated work groups and committees included, under its Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004, with its own section numbers and timeframes, so Victorian duty holders need the Victorian text. The older name this page's readers may know, "OHS committee", survives from that pre-harmonisation vocabulary; under the model law the statutory term is health and safety committee. Who holds which duty under which Act is mapped on the WHS laws reference page.
Sourcing note
Statutory wording is quoted from the model Work Health and Safety Bill, Parliamentary Counsel's Committee consolidation of 5 December 2025: Part 5 (ss 46–49 consultation; ss 50–74 HSRs including s 68 powers, s 70 PCBU obligations and s 72 training; ss 75–79 committees; ss 83–89 cessation of unsafe work; ss 90–102 provisional improvement notices) and s 27(5)(e) officer due-diligence examples. The HSR training entitlement is from regulation 21 of the model WHS Regulations, same consolidation date. Code passages are from the Model Code of Practice: Work health and safety consultation, cooperation and coordination, July 2023 edition, read in full. Model provisions bind only as enacted in each jurisdiction; penalty tiers are expressed as tiers in the model and set in dollars locally; Victoria is not covered by the model provisions described here. All sources read 9 July 2026.