The Duty Holder. Australian workplace safety, on the record. The Duty Holder. Australian workplace safety, on the record.

Section

Hazards + exposures

Silica, asbestos, psychosocial risk and the exposure standards that govern them, reported as the duties the current codes actually impose and cited to the primary document.

Hazards + exposures

What counts as a confined space, and why a trench usually does not

The definition turns on circumstances, not on how small the space is, so the same tank can qualify one day and not the next. A trench is not a confined space on collapse risk alone. Leaning your head in counts as entry, and you need a permit before the risk assessment that informs the permit.

Hazards + exposures

Diesel exhaust gets a hard number on 1 December: 0.01 milligrams per cubic metre

A workplace exposure limit for diesel particulate matter applies from 1 December 2026, and Safe Work Australia published three guides on 30 July to prepare for it. Same date as the transition where nine contested chemicals kept their old numbers, and the opposite outcome. Mining, tunnelling, quarrying and vehicle maintenance are named.

Hazards + exposures

The blood lead numbers you must actually hit, and the consultation that would lower them again

We reported in July that Safe Work Australia had opened a consultation on the lead regulations, conceding they may not be adequately protecting workers. What that piece did not give you was the arithmetic. Here it is. You must remove a worker from lead risk work once their blood lead exceeds 30 micrograms per decilitre, or 10 if she is of reproductive capacity. They may only return below 20, or 5. Those two return figures were halved in March 2025. The consultation now on the table would move the triggers again, and it closed at 11.59 pm AEST on Monday 24 August 2026.

Published

Hazards + exposures

The regulator has put AI on the hazard list, and a software update you did not ask for can trigger the duty

On 23 July 2026 Safe Work Australia published guidance on artificial intelligence and digital technologies, and filed it in the A-Z hazards library, next to noise and chemicals. The framing is deliberately unexciting: the process for managing these risks, it says, is the same as for any other workplace hazard. The detail is not unexciting at all. The guidance says the duty can be triggered by routine changes to IT systems, and by updates pushed by software providers, and it names the risks it expects: work intensification, surveillance scope creep, and workers held responsible for outputs they cannot control.

Published